“War on Terror” – An Intentional Choice of Words? A Corpus Analysis of war on and war against
نویسنده
چکیده
On 11 September 2001, President George W Bush declared a ‘war against terrorism’ but the official response to the attacks on America soon became known as the ‘war on terror’. The main aim of this paper is to report the findings of a corpus study designed to assess whether war on and war against are genuinely interchangeable. The findings show that war on is predominantly used for metaphorical wars, which begs the question as to why the White House should choose a metaphor for a campaign that was clearly going to involve military action. The answer is somewhat disquieting. The second aim is to examine how the German-speaking press renders war on terror and the reasons determining that lexical choice.
منابع مشابه
An Analytical View of Concept and Dimensions of War in Carl Von Clausewitz’s Thought
War and war-related concepts constitute a considerable portion of key words in political literature and strategic-security studies. Apart from its theoretical significance, war is a palpable term for the individuals and political players. It is a serious threat to humanity that has been paid due attention in the course of history by the political philosophers, strategists and even ordinary peop...
متن کاملThe Sociological Analysis of Iran-Iraq War based on Parsons' Theory
The present study attempts to analyze Iraq war against Iran based on Parsons' subsystems. The main question aims at finding the social positive/negative functions of the war. According to the studies, the first effect of the war was damaging behavioral organism subsystem so that it couldn't realize its functions. Subsequently, the chaos spread to the personality subsystem. Except for the qualit...
متن کامل300: Cultural Stereotypes and War against Barbarism
During the era of Bush administration and post-September 11th anti-terrorism discourse, the movie 300 was one of the best exemplar of a close relationship between Hollywood pop culture products and the neo-conservatives’ political discourse of nationalism. From my point of view, 300 is not an example of outstanding artistic films, but a film that more than any other film contains an Iranophobic...
متن کاملHollywood Post-9/11 Alien Films: Recontextualization of George. W. Bush's Discourse
The widely shocking attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11 was interpreted differently by various institutions worldwide, ranging from America's legitimate motive to begin a 'war on terror' to defend her 'very freedom', to a pretext for Bush administration to pursue G. H. W. Bush's temptation for 'a new world order'. Various institutions, therefore, made use of their...
متن کاملThe Long Small War: Indigenous Forces for Counterinsurgency
T he United States and its partners are prosecuting a protracted war against insurgents and terrorists who are animated by an ideology stemming from a radical fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. As of early 2006, the American national security bureaucracy began to use the appellation the “long war” in place of the Global War on Terrorism. At least one document describes this long war as the...
متن کامل